Ad is loading...
EEM vs TLTE
EEM vs TLTE Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs TLTE
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$43.10
Change-$0.11 (-0.25%)
Volume$11.03K
Net Assets15.77B
FlexShares Mstar EmgMkts FctTilt ETF
Price$52.19
Change+$0.04 (+0.08%)
Volume$227
Net Assets244.52M
EEM vs TLTE Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. TLTE commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Buy and TLTE is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 15.8B vs. TLTE (245M). EEM has a higher annual dividend yield than TLTE: EEM (3.324) vs TLTE (2.345). EEM was incepted earlier than TLTE: EEM (22 years) vs TLTE (12 years). TLTE has a higher turnover EEM (15.00) vs EEM (15.00).
| EEM | TLTE | EEM / TLTE | |
| Gain YTD | 3.324 | 2.345 | 142% |
| Net Assets | 15.8B | 245M | 6,449% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 39.00 | 38% |
| Yield | 2.57 | 3.99 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | TLTE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 84% | 24 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | +1.69% | ||
| BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | +6.22% | ||
| JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +5.07% | ||
| KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +13.12% | ||
| BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | +4.83% | ||
| BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | +5.76% | ||
More | ||||
TLTE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLTE has been loosely correlated with KC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLTE jumps, then KC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLTE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLTE | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| KC - TLTE | 62% Loosely correlated | +13.12% | ||
| BEKE - TLTE | 57% Loosely correlated | +5.53% | ||
| YUMC - TLTE | 56% Loosely correlated | +4.62% | ||
| TEL - TLTE | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| IQ - TLTE | 54% Loosely correlated | +7.41% | ||
More | ||||