Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs FPA
EEMA vs FPA Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs FPA
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$91.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$62.65K
Net Assets1.52B
First Trust AsiaPac ex-Jpn AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$37.41
Change+$0.04 (+0.11%)
Volume$596
Net Assets24.09M
EEMA vs FPA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. FPA commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Hold and FPA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.52B vs. FPA (24.1M). FPA has a higher annual dividend yield than EEMA: FPA (39.559) vs EEMA (27.463). EEMA was incepted earlier than FPA: EEMA (14 years) vs FPA (15 years). EEMA (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FPA (0.80). FPA has a higher turnover EEMA (7.00) vs EEMA (7.00).
| EEMA | FPA | EEMA / FPA | |
| Gain YTD | 27.463 | 39.559 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 24.1M | 6,299% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.80 | 61% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 75.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 2.66 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | FPA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 81% | 20 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
More | ||||
FPA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FPA has been loosely correlated with BLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FPA jumps, then BLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y