Ad is loading...
EEMA vs GMF
EEMA vs GMF Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs GMF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$72.25
Change-$1.18 (-1.61%)
Volume$132
CapitalizationN/A
SPDR® S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Price$117.18
Change-$1.84 (-1.55%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
EEMA vs GMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. GMF commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Hold and GMF is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 462M vs. GMF (363M). GMF has a higher annual dividend yield than EEMA: GMF (18.438) vs EEMA (12.970). EEMA was incepted earlier than GMF: EEMA (13 years) vs GMF (18 years). EEMA has a higher turnover GMF (9.00) vs GMF (9.00).
| EEMA | GMF | EEMA / GMF | |
| Gain YTD | 12.970 | 18.438 | 70% |
| Net Assets | 462M | 363M | 127% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 9.00 | 344% |
| Yield | 2.18 | 2.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -5.03% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | +4.58% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
More | ||||
GMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMF has been loosely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMF jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMF | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| WB - GMF | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.29% | ||
| JD - GMF | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| BEKE - GMF | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| BIDU - GMF | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| BZ - GMF | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||