Ad is loading...
EEMA vs GMF
EEMA vs GMF Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs GMF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$72.84
Change-$0.45 (-0.61%)
Volume$200
Net Assets392.17M
SPDR® S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Price$113.48
Change-$0.67 (-0.59%)
Volume$609
Net Assets346.27M
EEMA vs GMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. GMF commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Buy and GMF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 392M vs. GMF (346M). EEMA has a higher annual dividend yield than GMF: EEMA (2.289) vs GMF (-1.221). EEMA was incepted earlier than GMF: EEMA (13 years) vs GMF (18 years). EEMA (0.49) and GMF (0.49) have comparable expense ratios . EEMA has a higher turnover GMF (5.00) vs GMF (5.00).
| EEMA | GMF | EEMA / GMF | |
| Gain YTD | 2.289 | -1.221 | -188% |
| Net Assets | 392M | 346M | 113% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 100% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 5.00 | 140% |
| Yield | 1.69 | 1.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | 18 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | +1.27% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | -3.25% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | +2.27% | ||
More | ||||
GMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMF has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMF jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMF | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| WB - GMF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| JD - GMF | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.25% | ||
| BZ - GMF | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| BEKE - GMF | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.64% | ||
| BIDU - GMF | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.27% | ||
More | ||||