Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
EEMA vs GMF
EEMA vs GMF Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs GMF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$73.14
Change-$0.11 (-0.15%)
Volume$21.91K
CapitalizationN/A
SPDR® S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Price$116.15
Change-$0.41 (-0.35%)
Volume$11.33K
CapitalizationN/A
EEMA vs GMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. GMF commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a StrongSell and GMF is a Sell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 461M vs. GMF (357M). GMF has a higher annual dividend yield than EEMA: GMF (15.582) vs EEMA (11.015). EEMA was incepted earlier than GMF: EEMA (13 years) vs GMF (18 years). EEMA has a higher turnover GMF (9.00) vs GMF (9.00).
| EEMA | GMF | EEMA / GMF | |
| Gain YTD | 11.015 | 15.582 | 71% |
| Net Assets | 461M | 357M | 129% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 9.00 | 344% |
| Yield | 2.18 | 2.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 81% | 13 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | +8.60% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | +4.95% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||
GMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMF has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMF jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMF | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| JD - GMF | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.95% | ||
| WB - GMF | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| BIDU - GMF | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| BEKE - GMF | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| BILI - GMF | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
More | ||||