Ad is loading...
EEMA vs MINV
EEMA vs MINV Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs MINV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$72.24
Change+$0.19 (+0.26%)
Volume$11.03K
CapitalizationN/A
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
Price$26.57
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
Volume$1.14K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs MINV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
EEMA vs. MINV commentary
Sep 16, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Buy and MINV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 406M vs. MINV (67.4M). MINV has a higher annual dividend yield than EEMA: MINV (13.499) vs EEMA (9.649). EEMA was incepted earlier than MINV: EEMA (13 years) vs MINV (2 years). MINV has a higher turnover EEMA (31.00) vs EEMA (31.00).
| EEMA | MINV | EEMA / MINV | |
| Gain YTD | 9.649 | 13.499 | 71% |
| Net Assets | 406M | 67.4M | 602% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 277.86 | 11% |
| Yield | 2.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | -3.76% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||
MINV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MINV and LRCX have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MINV and LRCX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MINV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINV | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| LRCX - MINV | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.93% | ||
| ASML - MINV | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
| AMAT - MINV | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.87% | ||
| PDD - MINV | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.40% | ||
| NU - MINV | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
More | ||||