Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMCX vs RNWBX
EEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWBX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$14.77
Change+$0.12 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets741.69M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.90
Change+$0.78 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.59B
EEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 73.6B vs. EEMCX (742M). EEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EEMCX (0.28) vs RNWBX (0.12). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EEMCX (18 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EEMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.98 vs. RNWBX (17.99). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.22 vs. EEMCX (-8.41).
| EEMCX | RNWBX | EEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.67 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 1.67 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.276 | 23.589 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 742M | 73.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.12 | 241% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.98 | 17.99 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.32 | 43.01 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.41 | 15.22 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.74 | 84.60 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement