Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMCX vs RNWBX
EEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWBX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$15.10
Change-$0.14 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets782.85M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
EEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. EEMCX (783M). EEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EEMCX (0.29) vs RNWBX (0.12). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EEMCX (18 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EEMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.29 vs. RNWBX (11.48). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.41 vs. EEMCX (3.43).
| EEMCX | RNWBX | EEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.67 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 1.67 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.262 | 23.671 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 783M | 75.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.12 | 240% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.29 | 11.48 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.64 | 54.43 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.43 | 25.41 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.77 | 86.19 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement