Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMCX vs RNWBX
EEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWBX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$13.77
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets735.08M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.59
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
EEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. EEMCX (735M). EEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EEMCX (0.32) vs RNWBX (0.13). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EEMCX (18 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EEMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. RNWBX (12.87). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.93 vs. EEMCX (-0.33).
| EEMCX | RNWBX | EEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.67 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 1.67 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.794 | 17.729 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 735M | 71.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.13 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 12.87 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.62 | 30.09 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.33 | 22.93 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.02 | 72.17 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement