Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMCX vs RNWFX
EEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWFX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$14.77
Change+$0.12 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets741.69M
American Funds New World R5
Price$96.39
Change+$0.84 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.59B
EEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 73.6B vs. EEMCX (742M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EEMCX: RNWFX (0.95) vs EEMCX (0.28). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EEMCX (18 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). EEMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.98 vs. RNWFX (19.41). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.23 vs. EEMCX (-8.41).
| EEMCX | RNWFX | EEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 0.62 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.62 | 369% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.276 | 24.761 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 742M | 73.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.95 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.98 | 19.41 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.32 | 46.29 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.41 | 20.23 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.74 | 93.58 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers