Ad is loading...
EEMCX vs RNWFX
EEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWFX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$12.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets768.96M
American Funds New World R5
Price$79.31
Change+$0.25 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.36B
EEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.4B vs. EEMCX (769M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EEMCX: RNWFX (1.51) vs EEMCX (0.00). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EEMCX (17 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWFX (32.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. RNWFX (8.40). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.02 vs. EEMCX (-8.70).
| EEMCX | RNWFX | EEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.781 | 2.653 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 769M | 63.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.71 | 8.40 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.18 | 0.55 | -3,467% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.70 | 15.02 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.39 | 50.52 | 42% |