Ad is loading...
EEMCX vs RNWFX
EEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWFX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$11.89
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets730.41M
American Funds New World R5
Price$78.97
Change+$0.41 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.88B
EEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 61.9B vs. EEMCX (730M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EEMCX: RNWFX (1.17) vs EEMCX (0.36). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EEMCX (18 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). EEMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.31 vs. RNWFX (0.92). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.53 vs. EEMCX (24.40).
| EEMCX | RNWFX | EEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 0.62 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.62 | 369% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.763 | 2.213 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 730M | 61.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.17 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.31 | 0.92 | 469% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.72 | 3.87 | -199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.40 | 51.53 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.64 | 46.55 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...