Ad is loading...
EEMCX vs RNWFX
EEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWFX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$11.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New World R5
Price$77.72
Change+$0.12 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
EEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 62.2B vs. EEMCX (784M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EEMCX: RNWFX (1.51) vs EEMCX (0.00). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EEMCX (17 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWFX (32.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.97 vs. RNWFX (5.86). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.39 vs. EEMCX (-7.30).
| EEMCX | RNWFX | EEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.812 | 4.549 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 784M | 62.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.97 | 5.86 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.34 | -5.10 | 438% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.30 | 14.39 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.95 | 42.67 | 63% |