Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMCX vs RNWHX
EEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWHX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$14.77
Change+$0.12 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets741.69M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.76
Change+$0.82 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.59B
EEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 73.6B vs. EEMCX (742M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EEMCX: RNWHX (0.90) vs EEMCX (0.28). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMCX (18 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EEMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.98 vs. RNWHX (19.24). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.62 vs. EEMCX (-8.41).
| EEMCX | RNWHX | EEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 0.72 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.72 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.276 | 24.651 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 742M | 73.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.90 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.98 | 19.24 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.32 | 45.89 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.41 | 19.62 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.74 | 90.92 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement