Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMCX vs RNWHX
EEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWHX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$14.87
Change+$0.05 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets768.63M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$93.87
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
EEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. EEMCX (769M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EEMCX: RNWHX (0.97) vs EEMCX (0.31). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMCX (18 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EEMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.66 vs. RNWHX (17.01). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 31.85 vs. EEMCX (3.71).
| EEMCX | RNWHX | EEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 0.72 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.72 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.700 | 23.481 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 769M | 74.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.97 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.66 | 17.01 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.73 | 49.85 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.71 | 31.85 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement