EEMMF
Price
$0.94
Change
+$0.02 (+2.17%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
70.57M
ORRCF
Price
$0.19
Change
+$0.01 (+5.56%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
48.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EEMMF vs ORRCF

Header iconEEMMF vs ORRCF Comparison
Open Charts EEMMF vs ORRCFBanner chart's image
E3 LITHIUM
Price$0.94
Change+$0.02 (+2.17%)
Volume$9.83K
Capitalization70.57M
Oroco Resource
Price$0.19
Change+$0.01 (+5.56%)
Volume$23.53K
Capitalization48.5M
EEMMF vs ORRCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EEMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EEMMF vs. ORRCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMMF is a Hold and ORRCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EEMMF: $0.94 vs. ORRCF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: EEMMF and ORRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EEMMF: 42% vs. ORRCF: 16%
Market capitalization -- EEMMF: $70.57M vs. ORRCF: $48.5M
EEMMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $70.57M. ORRCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $48.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EEMMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileORRCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EEMMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ORRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EEMMF is a better buy in the long-term than ORRCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EEMMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ORRCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EEMMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ORRCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EEMMF is a better buy in the short-term than ORRCF.

Price Growth

EEMMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -13.62% price change this week, while ORRCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMMF($70.6M) has a higher market cap than ORRCF($48.5M). EEMMF YTD gains are higher at: 46.135 vs. ORRCF (1.081). ORRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.87M vs. EEMMF (-9.84M). EEMMF has more cash in the bank: 12M vs. ORRCF (1.16M). ORRCF has less debt than EEMMF: ORRCF (436K) vs EEMMF (878K). EEMMF (0) and ORRCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EEMMFORRCFEEMMF / ORRCF
Capitalization70.6M48.5M146%
EBITDA-9.84M-3.87M255%
Gain YTD46.1351.0814,268%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash12M1.16M1,033%
Total Debt878K436K201%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EEMMF vs ORRCF: Fundamental Ratings
EEMMF
ORRCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7315
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
9593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4084
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1006
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EEMMF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ORRCF (100). This means that EEMMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ORRCF’s over the last 12 months.

EEMMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as ORRCF (100). This means that EEMMF’s stock grew similarly to ORRCF’s over the last 12 months.

ORRCF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as EEMMF (95). This means that ORRCF’s stock grew similarly to EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

EEMMF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ORRCF (84). This means that EEMMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ORRCF’s over the last 12 months.

ORRCF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EEMMF (100). This means that ORRCF’s stock grew significantly faster than EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EEMMFORRCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EEMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESYJY6.290.04
+0.64%
easyJet Plc
PITAF21.68N/A
N/A
Poste Italiane SPA
GOGR0.05N/A
N/A
Go Green Global Technologies Corp.
SECVY15.67N/A
N/A
Seche Environment
GEVID5.80-0.32
-5.31%
GENERAL ENTERPRISE VENTURES INC.

EEMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EEMMF and NILIF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EEMMF and NILIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EEMMF
1D Price
Change %
EEMMF100%
+2.29%
NILIF - EEMMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
ATUSF - EEMMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
BHP - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
LAC - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
BDNNY - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
More