Advertisement
EENEF vs IDDWF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EENEF is a Hold and IDDWF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EENEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIDDWF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EENEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- IDDWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
EENEF (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IDDWF (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was -7.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.94%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wholesale Distributors (+1.43% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
| EENEF | IDDWF | EENEF / IDDWF | |
| Capitalization | 4.77B | 7.64B | 63% |
| EBITDA | 448M | 4.02B | 11% |
| Gain YTD | -16.578 | -10.278 | 161% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.00 | 28.65 | 56% |
| Revenue | 2.98B | 30.1B | 10% |
| Total Cash | 260M | 1.45B | 18% |
| Total Debt | 373M | 11.6B | 3% |
EENEF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CSUAX | 24.56 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A | |||
| JRAAX | 86.54 | N/A | N/A |
| Janus Henderson Research A | |||
| BCAMX | 70.71 | N/A | N/A |
| Boston Common ESG Impact US Equity | |||
| MMIJX | 22.52 | N/A | N/A |
| Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value Member | |||
| LCGNX | 27.26 | -0.04 | -0.15% |
| William Blair Large Cap Growth N | |||
EENEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EENEF and CWXZF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EENEF and CWXZF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EENEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EENEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CWXZF - EENEF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| RUSMF - EENEF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
| HDIUF - EENEF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KHDHF - EENEF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GROUF - EENEF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
IDDWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IDDWF and FAST have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDDWF and FAST's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IDDWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDDWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FAST - IDDWF | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
| KHDHF - IDDWF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WJXFF - IDDWF | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
| HDIUF - IDDWF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EENEF - IDDWF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||