EFA | EFAD | EFA / EFAD | |
Gain YTD | 21.592 | 14.547 | 148% |
Net Assets | 65.1B | 71.5M | 91,049% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.50 | 64% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 36.00 | 8% |
Yield | 2.96 | 2.32 | 128% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
EFA | EFAD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago84% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago80% | 10 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFAD and BNR have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFAD and BNR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EFAD | 100% | N/A | ||
BNR - EFAD | 11% Poorly correlated | +6.23% | ||
NEM - EFAD | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
SOL - EFAD | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.72% | ||
LOGI - EFAD | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
SAN - EFAD | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.53% | ||
More |