Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFA vs GXUS
EFA vs GXUS Comparison
Open Charts EFA vs GXUS
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$90.38
Change+$0.56 (+0.62%)
Volume$9.06K
Net Assets64.12B
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Ttl IntEqETF
Price$51.34
Change+$0.67 (+1.32%)
Volume$831
Net Assets510.6M
EFA vs GXUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFA vs. GXUS commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFA is a Hold and GXUS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFA has more net assets: 64.1B vs. GXUS (511M). EFA has a higher annual dividend yield than GXUS: EFA (20.852) vs GXUS (14.972). EFA was incepted earlier than GXUS: EFA (24 years) vs GXUS (2 years). GXUS (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than EFA (0.32). GXUS has a higher turnover EFA (3.00) vs EFA (3.00).
| EFA | GXUS | EFA / GXUS | |
| Gain YTD | 20.852 | 14.972 | 139% |
| Net Assets | 64.1B | 511M | 12,544% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.18 | 178% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 4.00 | 75% |
| Yield | 2.96 | 2.92 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EFA | GXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
GXUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXUS has been loosely correlated with ICAGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXUS jumps, then ICAGY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXUS | 100% | +1.34% | ||
| ICAGY - GXUS | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| HLN - GXUS | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.27% | ||
| ONC - GXUS | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| OTEX - GXUS | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.80% | ||
| LTM - GXUS | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||