EFA | QLVD | EFA / QLVD | |
Gain YTD | 22.251 | 20.294 | 110% |
Net Assets | 65.9B | 59.2M | 111,318% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.12 | 267% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 46.00 | 7% |
Yield | 2.88 | 2.54 | 114% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
EFA | QLVD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago80% | 18 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLVD has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLVD jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QLVD | 100% | -0.45% | ||
BN - QLVD | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
FERG - QLVD | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
SHEL - QLVD | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
GFL - QLVD | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
SW - QLVD | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
More |