Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFAD vs SSXU
EFAD vs SSXU Comparison
Open Charts EFAD vs SSXU
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers
Price$42.59
Change-$0.35 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.39M
Day Hagan Smart Sector International ETF
Price$34.38
Change-$0.12 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.76M
EFAD vs SSXU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFAD vs. SSXU commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFAD is a StrongBuy and SSXU is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFAD has more net assets: 68.4M vs. SSXU (33.8M). SSXU has a higher annual dividend yield than EFAD: SSXU (23.909) vs EFAD (17.830). EFAD was incepted earlier than SSXU: EFAD (11 years) vs SSXU (3 years). SSXU has a higher turnover EFAD (36.00) vs EFAD (36.00).
| EFAD | SSXU | EFAD / SSXU | |
| Gain YTD | 17.830 | 23.909 | 75% |
| Net Assets | 68.4M | 33.8M | 202% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 231.00 | 16% |
| Yield | 2.30 | 1.96 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EFAD | SSXU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 76% | 13 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EFAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFAD and NG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFAD and NG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAD | 100% | N/A | ||
| NG - EFAD | 25% Poorly correlated | +4.24% | ||
| CSL - EFAD | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| ROG - EFAD | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.49% | ||
| NEM - EFAD | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.76% | ||
| CAR - EFAD | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||