| EFAS | FNDF | EFAS / FNDF | |
| Gain YTD | 40.907 | 36.054 | 113% |
| Net Assets | 34.5M | 18.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.25 | 220% |
| Turnover | 64.02 | 12.00 | 534% |
| Yield | 5.17 | 2.79 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| EFAS | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 79% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CSQ | 19.00 | 0.27 | +1.44% |
| Calamos Strategic Total Return | |||
| IGLD | 25.49 | 0.23 | +0.91% |
| FT Vest Gold Strategy Trgt Inc ETF | |||
| FMCX | 33.55 | N/A | N/A |
| FM Focus Equity ETF | |||
| CBTA | 28.32 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April | |||
| WEBS | 20.07 | -0.66 | -3.18% |
| Direxion Daily Dow Jones Int Br 3X ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAS has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFAS jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAS | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| BHP - EFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| RIO - EFAS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| VOD - EFAS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| BBVA - EFAS | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| TTE - EFAS | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| SAN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||