Ad is loading...
EFAS vs FNDF
EFAS vs FNDF Comparison
Open Charts EFAS vs FNDF
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
Price$15.91
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
Volume$626
Net Assets9.87M
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$35.63
Change-$0.64 (-1.76%)
Volume$100
Net Assets14.39B
EFAS vs FNDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFAS vs. FNDF commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFAS is a Buy and FNDF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 14.4B vs. EFAS (9.87M). EFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDF: EFAS (15.093) vs FNDF (9.214). EFAS was incepted earlier than FNDF: EFAS (8 years) vs FNDF (12 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than EFAS (0.56). EFAS has a higher turnover FNDF (11.00) vs FNDF (11.00).
| EFAS | FNDF | EFAS / FNDF | |
| Gain YTD | 15.093 | 9.214 | 164% |
| Net Assets | 9.87M | 14.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.25 | 224% |
| Turnover | 64.02 | 11.00 | 582% |
| Yield | 6.03 | 3.70 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAS has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFAS jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAS | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| BHP - EFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| RIO - EFAS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| TEF - EFAS | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| BBVA - EFAS | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| TTE - EFAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
More | ||||