Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFAS vs FNDF
EFAS vs FNDF Comparison
Open Charts EFAS vs FNDF
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
Price$19.15
Change-$0.11 (-0.57%)
Volume$100
Net Assets31.83M
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$42.95
Change-$0.19 (-0.44%)
Volume$15.89K
Net Assets17.73B
EFAS vs FNDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFAS vs. FNDF commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFAS is a Buy and FNDF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 17.7B vs. EFAS (31.8M). EFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDF: EFAS (42.356) vs FNDF (30.090). EFAS was incepted earlier than FNDF: EFAS (9 years) vs FNDF (12 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than EFAS (0.55). EFAS has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| EFAS | FNDF | EFAS / FNDF | |
| Gain YTD | 42.356 | 30.090 | 141% |
| Net Assets | 31.8M | 17.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.25 | 220% |
| Turnover | 64.02 | 12.00 | 534% |
| Yield | 5.11 | 2.92 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EFAS | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 71% | 16 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAS has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFAS jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAS | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| BHP - EFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| RIO - EFAS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| BBVA - EFAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| TTE - EFAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| BP - EFAS | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
More | ||||
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| SAN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| MT - FNDF | 70% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||