| EFAV | SCHF | EFAV / SCHF | |
| Gain YTD | 22.587 | 27.157 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 5.16B | 52.9B | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.03 | 667% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 4.00 | 600% |
| Yield | 2.90 | 2.38 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| EFAV | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NCIQ | 24.38 | 0.35 | +1.45% |
| Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF | |||
| IXJ | 95.86 | 0.38 | +0.40% |
| iShares Global Healthcare ETF | |||
| MOTG | 44.06 | -0.07 | -0.15% |
| VanEck Morningstar Glb Wd Mt ETF | |||
| TVAL | 33.98 | -0.07 | -0.22% |
| T. Rowe Price Value ETF | |||
| XBJL | 37.31 | -0.10 | -0.25% |
| Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF Jul | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAV has been loosely correlated with HLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFAV jumps, then HLN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAV | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| HLN - EFAV | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| AZN - EFAV | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| DTE - EFAV | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| SAN - EFAV | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| GSK - EFAV | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHF | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| STM - SCHF | 79% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| BN - SCHF | 72% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| SAN - SCHF | 71% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| MFC - SCHF | 70% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| MFG - SCHF | 68% Closely correlated | -3.39% | ||
More | ||||