Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFCCX vs RGACX
EFCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EFCCX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
EFCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFCCX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. EFCCX (19.3M). RGACX pays higher dividends than EFCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs EFCCX (0.00). EFCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EFCCX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). EFCCX (2.72) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). EFCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EFCCX: RGACX (250) vs EFCCX (2000). EFCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.76 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX (40.02) and EFCCX (38.45) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EFCCX | RGACX | EFCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.94 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 0.94 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.707 | 15.516 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.3M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.76 | 17.83 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.65 | 58.53 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.45 | 40.02 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.51 | 95.93 | 101% |