EFG | IHDG | EFG / IHDG | |
Gain YTD | 3.914 | -0.138 | -2,836% |
Net Assets | 12.4B | 2.86B | 434% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.58 | 62% |
Turnover | 22.00 | 57.00 | 39% |
Yield | 1.59 | 1.93 | 82% |
Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
EFG | IHDG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 10 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago61% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHDG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IHDG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IHDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IHDG | 100% | -0.18% | ||
STM - IHDG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
ASML - IHDG | 66% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
AMP - IHDG | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
SAP - IHDG | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
CSL - IHDG | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
More |