EFG | IHDG | EFG / IHDG | |
Gain YTD | 7.343 | 6.901 | 106% |
Net Assets | 16.6B | 3.02B | 549% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 19.00 | 86.00 | 22% |
Yield | 1.52 | 1.67 | 91% |
Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
EFG | IHDG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago62% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago83% | 10 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago82% | 2 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHDG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IHDG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IHDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IHDG | 100% | -0.58% | ||
STM - IHDG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.23% | ||
ASML - IHDG | 66% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
AMP - IHDG | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
SAP - IHDG | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
CSL - IHDG | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
More |