EFG | PIZ | EFG / PIZ | |
Gain YTD | 7.343 | 8.660 | 85% |
Net Assets | 16.4B | 192M | 8,542% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 19.00 | 144.00 | 13% |
Yield | 1.52 | 1.41 | 108% |
Fund Existence | 20 years | 17 years | - |
EFG | PIZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 5 days ago89% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago83% | 5 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago82% | 2 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago64% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIZ has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIZ jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PIZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PIZ | 100% | -1.45% | ||
STM - PIZ | 76% Closely correlated | -2.23% | ||
BNS - PIZ | 74% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
RY - PIZ | 74% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
FERG - PIZ | 71% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
ASML - PIZ | 70% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
More |