EFG | UMMA | EFG / UMMA | |
Gain YTD | 1.818 | 2.496 | 73% |
Net Assets | 15.5B | 120M | 12,917% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 19.00 | 11.00 | 173% |
Yield | 1.52 | 0.79 | 192% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 3 years | - |
EFG | UMMA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago90% | 11 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago76% | 11 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago85% | 11 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago87% | 11 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago83% | 11 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago80% | 11 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago82% | 13 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago82% | 20 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UMMA | 100% | -0.21% | ||
ASML - UMMA | 73% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
TSM - UMMA | 69% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
SAP - UMMA | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
BHP - UMMA | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
CP - UMMA | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More |