EFG | UMMA | EFG / UMMA | |
Gain YTD | 16.824 | 16.612 | 101% |
Net Assets | 9.99B | 159M | 6,282% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.65 | 55% |
Turnover | 22.00 | 11.00 | 200% |
Yield | 1.60 | 0.83 | 193% |
Fund Existence | 20 years | 4 years | - |
EFG | UMMA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago84% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago82% | 4 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UMMA | 100% | -0.61% | ||
TSM - UMMA | 75% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
ASML - UMMA | 67% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
BHP - UMMA | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.09% | ||
CRH - UMMA | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
SAP - UMMA | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
More |