EFGIF
Price
$13.24
Change
-$1.76 (-11.73%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.8B
SCBFY
Price
$32.72
Change
-$0.50 (-1.51%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
26.81B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFGIF vs SCBFY

Header iconEFGIF vs SCBFY Comparison
Open Charts EFGIF vs SCBFYBanner chart's image
EFG International AG
Price$13.24
Change-$1.76 (-11.73%)
Volume$206
Capitalization2.8B
Standard Chartered
Price$32.72
Change-$0.50 (-1.51%)
Volume$64.36K
Capitalization26.81B
EFGIF vs SCBFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFGIF vs. SCBFY commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFGIF is a Buy and SCBFY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (EFGIF: $13.24 vs. SCBFY: $32.90)
Brand notoriety: EFGIF and SCBFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFGIF: 100% vs. SCBFY: 45%
Market capitalization -- EFGIF: $2.8B vs. SCBFY: $26.81B
EFGIF [@Major Banks] is valued at $2.8B. SCBFY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $26.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFGIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFY’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • EFGIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFY is a better buy in the long-term than EFGIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCBFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

EFGIF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCBFY (@Major Banks) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.80% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBFY($26.8B) has a higher market cap than EFGIF($2.8B). EFGIF has higher P/E ratio than SCBFY: EFGIF (14.68) vs SCBFY (9.88). SCBFY YTD gains are higher at: 33.574 vs. EFGIF (-4.123). EFGIF has less debt than SCBFY: EFGIF (32.9M) vs SCBFY (93.9B). SCBFY has higher revenues than EFGIF: SCBFY (17.1B) vs EFGIF (1.4B).
EFGIFSCBFYEFGIF / SCBFY
Capitalization2.8B26.8B10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.12333.574-12%
P/E Ratio14.689.88149%
Revenue1.4B17.1B8%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt32.9M93.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFGIF: Fundamental Ratings
EFGIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFGIFSCBFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNYR3.060.21
+7.37%
Synergy CHC Corp
ENLT23.600.87
+3.83%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd
PLRX1.170.01
+0.86%
Pliant Therapeutics
PCTY182.301.11
+0.61%
Paylocity Holding Corp
TRML15.83-0.16
-1.00%
Tourmaline Bio

EFGIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFGIF and BCMXY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFGIF and BCMXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFGIF
1D Price
Change %
EFGIF100%
N/A
BCMXY - EFGIF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZGY - EFGIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
SCBFY - EFGIF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
SMFNF - EFGIF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
SVNLF - EFGIF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
More

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
-1.51%
HSBC - SCBFY
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
BCS - SCBFY
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
ING - SCBFY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
SAN - SCBFY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
SCBFF - SCBFY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
More