EFGIF
Price
$20.00
Change
+$6.76 (+51.06%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
6.06B
SCBFY
Price
$37.28
Change
+$0.42 (+1.14%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
42.27B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFGIF vs SCBFY

Header iconEFGIF vs SCBFY Comparison
Open Charts EFGIF vs SCBFYBanner chart's image
EFG International AG
Price$20.00
Change+$6.76 (+51.06%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization6.06B
Standard Chartered
Price$37.28
Change+$0.42 (+1.14%)
Volume$53.92K
Capitalization42.27B
EFGIF vs SCBFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFGIF vs. SCBFY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFGIF is a Hold and SCBFY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (EFGIF: $20.00 vs. SCBFY: $37.28)
Brand notoriety: EFGIF and SCBFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFGIF: 195% vs. SCBFY: 45%
Market capitalization -- EFGIF: $6.06B vs. SCBFY: $42.27B
EFGIF [@Major Banks] is valued at $6.06B. SCBFY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $42.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFGIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFGIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EFGIF and SCBFY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFGIF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFGIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFY is a better buy in the short-term than EFGIF.

Price Growth

EFGIF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCBFY (@Major Banks) price change was -1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCBFY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBFY($42.3B) has a higher market cap than EFGIF($6.06B). EFGIF has higher P/E ratio than SCBFY: EFGIF (13.98) vs SCBFY (10.25). SCBFY YTD gains are higher at: 53.189 vs. EFGIF (44.774). EFGIF has less debt than SCBFY: EFGIF (910M) vs SCBFY (99.4B). SCBFY has higher revenues than EFGIF: SCBFY (20.5B) vs EFGIF (1.55B).
EFGIFSCBFYEFGIF / SCBFY
Capitalization6.06B42.3B14%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD44.77453.18984%
P/E Ratio13.9810.25136%
Revenue1.55B20.5B8%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt910M99.4B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFGIF vs SCBFY: Fundamental Ratings
EFGIF
SCBFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28
SMR RATING
1..100
186
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3134
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5511

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFGIF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (59). This means that EFGIF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

EFGIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (8). This means that EFGIF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as EFGIF (18). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to EFGIF’s over the last 12 months.

EFGIF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (42). This means that EFGIF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

EFGIF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (34). This means that EFGIF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFGIFSCBFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBMIX51.450.39
+0.76%
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Inv
FLIIX12.170.01
+0.08%
First Sentier Global Listed Infras I
CADRX24.18N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst2
SUWCX33.59-0.10
-0.30%
DWS Core Equity C
FXAIX225.60-0.68
-0.30%
Fidelity 500 Index

EFGIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFGIF and BCMXY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFGIF and BCMXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFGIF
1D Price
Change %
EFGIF100%
N/A
BCMXY - EFGIF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
ANZGY - EFGIF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
SCBFY - EFGIF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
SMFNF - EFGIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
SVNLF - EFGIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
+1.14%
HSBC - SCBFY
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
BCS - SCBFY
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
ING - SCBFY
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
SAN - SCBFY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
SCBFF - SCBFY
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
More