EFGIF
Price
$20.00
Change
+$6.76 (+51.06%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
6.06B
SVNLF
Price
$12.98
Change
+$0.29 (+2.29%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
26.28B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFGIF vs SVNLF

Header iconEFGIF vs SVNLF Comparison
Open Charts EFGIF vs SVNLFBanner chart's image
EFG International AG
Price$20.00
Change+$6.76 (+51.06%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization6.06B
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
Price$12.98
Change+$0.29 (+2.29%)
Volume$1.12K
Capitalization26.28B
EFGIF vs SVNLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFGIF vs. SVNLF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFGIF is a Buy and SVNLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (EFGIF: $20.00 vs. SVNLF: $12.98)
Brand notoriety: EFGIF and SVNLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFGIF: 371% vs. SVNLF: 34%
Market capitalization -- EFGIF: $6.06B vs. SVNLF: $26.28B
EFGIF [@Major Banks] is valued at $6.06B. SVNLF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $26.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $798.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $130.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFGIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSVNLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFGIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SVNLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFGIF is a better buy in the long-term than SVNLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFGIF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVNLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFGIF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SVNLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVNLF is a better buy in the short-term than EFGIF.

Price Growth

EFGIF (@Major Banks) experienced а +51.00% price change this week, while SVNLF (@Major Banks) price change was +2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.71% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVNLF($26.3B) has a higher market cap than EFGIF($6.06B). EFGIF has higher P/E ratio than SVNLF: EFGIF (14.00) vs SVNLF (9.39). EFGIF YTD gains are higher at: 44.774 vs. SVNLF (24.916). EFGIF has less debt than SVNLF: EFGIF (910M) vs SVNLF (1.57T). SVNLF has higher revenues than EFGIF: SVNLF (60.1B) vs EFGIF (1.55B).
EFGIFSVNLFEFGIF / SVNLF
Capitalization6.06B26.3B23%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD44.77424.916180%
P/E Ratio14.009.39149%
Revenue1.55B60.1B3%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt910M1.57T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFGIF vs SVNLF: Fundamental Ratings
EFGIF
SVNLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5028
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
254
SMR RATING
1..100
172
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3027
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFGIF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVNLF (97). This means that EFGIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVNLF’s over the last 12 months.

EFGIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVNLF (54). This means that EFGIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as EFGIF (17). This means that SVNLF’s stock grew similarly to EFGIF’s over the last 12 months.

EFGIF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLF (52). This means that EFGIF’s stock grew similarly to SVNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as EFGIF (30). This means that SVNLF’s stock grew similarly to EFGIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFGIFSVNLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXHAX26.660.12
+0.45%
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
DRECX40.000.18
+0.45%
Davis Real Estate C
JGRSX13.21N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Shareholder Yield R6
USDAUD1.54N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Australian Dollar
HKDCNY0.92N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - China Yuan

EFGIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFGIF and BCMXY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFGIF and BCMXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFGIF
1D Price
Change %
EFGIF100%
N/A
BCMXY - EFGIF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZGY - EFGIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
SCBFY - EFGIF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.31%
SMFNF - EFGIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+7.37%
SVNLF - EFGIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SVNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVNLF has been loosely correlated with SVNLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVNLF jumps, then SVNLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVNLF
1D Price
Change %
SVNLF100%
N/A
SVNLY - SVNLF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
ANZGY - SVNLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
SCBFY - SVNLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-7.31%
ANZGF - SVNLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEBNF - SVNLF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
More