EFGSF
Price
$104.83
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
ESOA
Price
$10.82
Change
+$0.25 (+2.37%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
55 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EFGSF vs ESOA

Header iconEFGSF vs ESOA Comparison
Open Charts EFGSF vs ESOABanner chart's image
Eiffage SA
Price$104.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$279
CapitalizationN/A
Energy Services of America
Price$10.82
Change+$0.25 (+2.37%)
Volume$114.07K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
EFGSF vs ESOA Comparison Chart
Loading...
ESOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
EFGSF vs. ESOA commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFGSF is a Hold and ESOA is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EFGSF: $104.82 vs. ESOA: $10.82)
Brand notoriety: EFGSF and ESOA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFGSF: 155% vs. ESOA: 62%
Market capitalization -- EFGSF: $9.79B vs. ESOA: $157.42M
EFGSF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $9.79B. ESOA’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $157.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $6.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFGSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESOA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ESOA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESOA is a better buy in the long-term than EFGSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESOA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ESOA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

EFGSF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ESOA (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +9.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESOA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+2.46% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFGSF($9.79B) has a higher market cap than ESOA($157M). EFGSF has higher P/E ratio than ESOA: EFGSF (8.96) vs ESOA (6.55). ESOA YTD gains are higher at: 80.936 vs. EFGSF (15.129). EFGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.97B vs. ESOA (44.3M). EFGSF has more cash in the bank: 3.96B vs. ESOA (14.5M). ESOA has less debt than EFGSF: ESOA (34.4M) vs EFGSF (15.6B). EFGSF has higher revenues than ESOA: EFGSF (23.1B) vs ESOA (352M).
EFGSFESOAEFGSF / ESOA
Capitalization9.79B157M6,232%
EBITDA3.97B44.3M8,957%
Gain YTD15.12980.93619%
P/E Ratio8.966.55137%
Revenue23.1B352M6,563%
Total Cash3.96B14.5M27,276%
Total Debt15.6B34.4M45,349%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFGSF vs ESOA: Fundamental Ratings
EFGSF
ESOA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4915
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
624
SMR RATING
1..100
9718
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7798
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFGSF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as ESOA (44). This means that EFGSF’s stock grew similarly to ESOA’s over the last 12 months.

ESOA's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFGSF (62). This means that ESOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

ESOA's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EFGSF (97). This means that ESOA’s stock grew significantly faster than EFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

ESOA's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as EFGSF (50). This means that ESOA’s stock grew similarly to EFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

EFGSF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as ESOA (98). This means that EFGSF’s stock grew similarly to ESOA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESOA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ESOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

EFGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFGSF and EFGSY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFGSF and EFGSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFGSF
1D Price
Change %
EFGSF100%
N/A
EFGSY - EFGSF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
HOCFF - EFGSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMPJY - EFGSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JGCCF - EFGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESOA - EFGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
More

ESOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESOA and GLDD have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESOA and GLDD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESOA
1D Price
Change %
ESOA100%
+2.37%
GLDD - ESOA
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
BLNK - ESOA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
ACA - ESOA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
FLR - ESOA
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
MTRX - ESOA
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
More