EFRGF
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
MRIRF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.15 (-83.33%)
Updated
Nov 29 closing price
Ad is loading...

EFRGF vs MRIRF

Header iconEFRGF vs MRIRF Comparison
Open Charts EFRGF vs MRIRFBanner chart's image
Pasofino Gold
Price$0.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$973
CapitalizationN/A
Route 109 Resources
Price$0.03
Change-$0.15 (-83.33%)
Volume$355
CapitalizationN/A
EFRGF vs MRIRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EFRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRIRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFRGF vs. MRIRF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFRGF is a Hold and MRIRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (EFRGF: $0.41 vs. MRIRF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: EFRGF and MRIRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFRGF: 17% vs. MRIRF: 63%
Market capitalization -- EFRGF: $41.53M vs. MRIRF: $2.87M
EFRGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $41.53M. MRIRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFRGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRIRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EFRGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRIRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFRGF is a better buy in the long-term than MRIRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFRGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRIRF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFRGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MRIRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFRGF is a better buy in the short-term than MRIRF.

Price Growth

EFRGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.12% price change this week, while MRIRF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFRGF($41.5M) has a higher market cap than MRIRF($2.87M). EFRGF YTD gains are higher at: 58.022 vs. MRIRF (-74.397). MRIRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -621.08K vs. EFRGF (-5.44M). EFRGF has more cash in the bank: 1.39M vs. MRIRF (821K). EFRGF (0) and MRIRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EFRGFMRIRFEFRGF / MRIRF
Capitalization41.5M2.87M1,446%
EBITDA-5.44M-621.08K877%
Gain YTD58.022-74.397-78%
P/E RatioN/A4.61-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.39M821K169%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFRGF: Fundamental Ratings
EFRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFRGFMRIRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EFRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRIRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBHMX8.46N/A
N/A
Victory Market Neutral Income Member
JABVX10.75-0.06
-0.56%
JHancock Global Environmental Opps I
BRUKX15.49-0.10
-0.64%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R2
FGLGX23.34-0.17
-0.72%
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock
NECOX24.21-0.24
-0.98%
Natixis Oakmark C

EFRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFRGF and GMINF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFRGF and GMINF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFRGF
1D Price
Change %
EFRGF100%
N/A
GMINF - EFRGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
TIHRF - EFRGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRIRF - EFRGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNCCF - EFRGF
0%
Poorly correlated
+6.00%
MSLVF - EFRGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MRIRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRIRF has been loosely correlated with TAJIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRIRF jumps, then TAJIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRIRF
1D Price
Change %
MRIRF100%
N/A
TAJIF - MRIRF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KSTBF - MRIRF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUCCF - MRIRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFRGF - MRIRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A