EFSC
Price
$52.30
Change
-$1.17 (-2.19%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
43 days until earnings call
MQ
Price
$5.38
Change
-$0.13 (-2.36%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs MQ

Header iconEFSC vs MQ Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs MQBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$52.30
Change-$1.17 (-2.19%)
Volume$206.37K
Capitalization1.47B
Marqeta
Price$5.38
Change-$0.13 (-2.36%)
Volume$9.1M
Capitalization3.06B
EFSC vs MQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. MQ commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a StrongBuy and MQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSC: $52.30 vs. MQ: $5.38)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and MQ are both not notable
EFSC represents the Regional Banks, while MQ is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 116% vs. MQ: 118%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $1.47B vs. MQ: $3.06B
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.47B. MQ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than MQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MQ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MQ is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.10% price change this week, while MQ (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

MQ is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

@Packaged Software (-1.68% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MQ($3.06B) has a higher market cap than EFSC($1.47B). MQ YTD gains are higher at: 41.953 vs. EFSC (-6.774). MQ has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. EFSC (193M). MQ has less debt than EFSC: MQ (16.9M) vs EFSC (204M). MQ has higher revenues than EFSC: MQ (676M) vs EFSC (550M).
EFSCMQEFSC / MQ
Capitalization1.47B3.06B48%
EBITDAN/A-272.27M-
Gain YTD-6.77441.953-16%
P/E Ratio7.73N/A-
Revenue550M676M81%
Total Cash193M1.25B15%
Total Debt204M16.9M1,207%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
9
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCMQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTXAX12.70N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Real Assets A
RIEBX26.19-0.15
-0.57%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2E
BQLCX22.30-0.22
-0.98%
Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Instl
GPIGX13.09-0.13
-0.98%
Guidepath® Growth and Income
THGCX25.31-0.29
-1.13%
Thornburg International Equity C