It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNECB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EFSC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NECB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.25% price change this week, while NECB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.86%.
EFSC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.
NECB is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
EFSC | NECB | EFSC / NECB | |
Capitalization | 1.47B | 221M | 665% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 36.362 | 69.347 | 52% |
P/E Ratio | 7.73 | 4.70 | 164% |
Revenue | 550M | 101M | 545% |
Total Cash | 193M | 14.3M | 1,350% |
Total Debt | 204M | 69.2M | 295% |
EFSC | NECB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NECB's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NECB’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
NECB's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NECB’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
EFSC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NECB (25) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to NECB’s over the last 12 months.
NECB's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (38) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NECB’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NECB (18) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to NECB’s over the last 12 months.
EFSC | NECB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago23% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago29% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago54% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago40% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago53% | 4 days ago62% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago68% | 2 days ago36% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago25% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago56% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
LADPX | 22.03 | 0.53 | +2.47% |
Lord Abbett Developing Growth P | |||
HDGSX | 38.76 | 0.25 | +0.65% |
Hartford Dividend and Growth R4 | |||
IVGTX | 15.79 | 0.10 | +0.64% |
VY® Morgan Stanley Global Franchise S | |||
CRTVX | 12.06 | N/A | N/A |
Catholic Rsp Invst Mlt-Styl US Eq Inv | |||
HSXFX | 8.62 | -0.01 | -0.12% |
Hartford Schroders Diversified Em Mkts F |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with NBTB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then NBTB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EFSC | 100% | +1.70% | ||
NBTB - EFSC | 87% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
PRK - EFSC | 86% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
TRST - EFSC | 86% Closely correlated | +1.32% | ||
FRME - EFSC | 85% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
GSBC - EFSC | 85% Closely correlated | +1.34% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NECB has been closely correlated with RBCAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NECB jumps, then RBCAA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NECB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NECB | 100% | -0.71% | ||
RBCAA - NECB | 70% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
THFF - NECB | 68% Closely correlated | +1.51% | ||
CCNE - NECB | 68% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
FBIZ - NECB | 68% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
EFSC - NECB | 67% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More |