EFSC
Price
$60.90
Change
+$0.74 (+1.23%)
Updated
Aug 26, 11:06 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.23B
62 days until earnings call
WTBFB
Price
$314.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
791.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs WTBFB

Header iconEFSC vs WTBFB Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs WTBFBBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$60.90
Change+$0.74 (+1.23%)
Volume$1.01K
Capitalization2.23B
W.T.B. Financial
Price$314.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.42K
Capitalization791.97M
EFSC vs WTBFB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. WTBFB commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a StrongBuy and WTBFB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSC: $60.16 vs. WTBFB: $314.00)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and WTBFB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 83% vs. WTBFB: 100%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.23B vs. WTBFB: $791.97M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.23B. WTBFB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $791.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWTBFB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WTBFB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than WTBFB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTBFB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WTBFB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than WTBFB.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.45% price change this week, while WTBFB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.89% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($2.23B) has a higher market cap than WTBFB($792M). EFSC (11.44) and WTBFB (11.27) have similar P/E ratio . EFSC YTD gains are higher at: 7.855 vs. WTBFB (2.570). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 260M vs. WTBFB (130M). WTBFB has less debt than EFSC: WTBFB (500M) vs EFSC (661M). EFSC has higher revenues than WTBFB: EFSC (552M) vs WTBFB (380M).
EFSCWTBFBEFSC / WTBFB
Capitalization2.23B792M281%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.8552.570306%
P/E Ratio11.4411.27102%
Revenue552M380M145%
Total Cash260M130M200%
Total Debt661M500M132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs WTBFB: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
WTBFB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1235
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2864
SMR RATING
1..100
1521
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5087
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFSC's Valuation (58) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTBFB (93) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTBFB (64) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WTBFB (21) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WTBFB (52) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTBFB (87) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCWTBFB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNWPX2.330.02
+0.87%
US Global Investors World Prec Mnral
PJORX17.01N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Focused Value R
OPGIX50.16N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Opportunities A
GSITX59.02N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts Instl
DOXBX109.70-0.47
-0.43%
Dodge & Cox Balanced X

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
-0.57%
WSFS - EFSC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
GABC - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
STBA - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
SBCF - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
UCB - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
More

WTBFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTBFB has been loosely correlated with BANF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTBFB jumps, then BANF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTBFB
1D Price
Change %
WTBFB100%
N/A
BANF - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
STBA - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
TCBK - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
EFSC - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
ASB - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
More