EFSCP
Price
$20.49
Change
+$0.40 (+1.99%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
FLG
Price
$11.17
Change
+$0.21 (+1.92%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.56B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSCP vs FLG

Header iconEFSCP vs FLG Comparison
Open Charts EFSCP vs FLGBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$20.49
Change+$0.40 (+1.99%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Flagstar Financial
Price$11.17
Change+$0.21 (+1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization2.56B
EFSCP vs FLG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFSCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSCP vs. FLG commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSCP is a StrongBuy and FLG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSCP: $20.09 vs. FLG: $10.96)
Brand notoriety: EFSCP and FLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSCP: 70% vs. FLG: 89%
Market capitalization -- EFSCP: $0 vs. FLG: $2.56B
EFSCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. FLG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSCP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the long-term than EFSCP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSCP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FLG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSCP is a better buy in the short-term than FLG.

Price Growth

EFSCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.70% price change this week, while FLG (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.77% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG YTD gains are higher at: 17.674 vs. EFSCP (5.161). EFSCP has less debt than FLG: EFSCP (204M) vs FLG (21.3B). FLG has higher revenues than EFSCP: FLG (3.63B) vs EFSCP (550M).
EFSCPFLGEFSCP / FLG
CapitalizationN/A2.56B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.16117.67429%
P/E RatioN/A1.16-
Revenue550M3.63B15%
Total Cash193MN/A-
Total Debt204M21.3B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCPFLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VRCA0.650.05
+7.87%
Verrica Pharmaceuticals
CAN0.650.04
+7.38%
Canaan
HBANP17.630.21
+1.21%
Huntington Bancshares
VCYT27.570.25
+0.92%
Veracyte
VIPS15.07-0.03
-0.20%
Vipshop Holdings Limited

EFSCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSCP has been loosely correlated with FRST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFSCP jumps, then FRST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSCP
1D Price
Change %
EFSCP100%
+0.73%
FRST - EFSCP
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
FLG - EFSCP
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
MYFW - EFSCP
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
WBS - EFSCP
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
ESQ - EFSCP
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been loosely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
+0.09%
SBNY - FLG
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TECTP - FLG
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
OZKAP - FLG
36%
Loosely correlated
+4.27%
VLYPP - FLG
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
WAFDP - FLG
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
More