EFSCP
Price
$20.71
Change
+$0.27 (+1.32%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
FLG
Price
$12.97
Change
+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.39B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSCP vs FLG

Header iconEFSCP vs FLG Comparison
Open Charts EFSCP vs FLGBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$20.71
Change+$0.27 (+1.32%)
Volume$965
CapitalizationN/A
Flagstar Financial
Price$12.97
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Volume$4.36M
Capitalization5.39B
EFSCP vs FLG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFSCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSCP vs. FLG commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSCP is a StrongBuy and FLG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSCP: $20.72 vs. FLG: $12.97)
Brand notoriety: EFSCP and FLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSCP: 43% vs. FLG: 70%
Market capitalization -- EFSCP: $0 vs. FLG: $5.39B
EFSCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. FLG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSCP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the long-term than EFSCP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSCP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FLG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the short-term than EFSCP.

Price Growth

EFSCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while FLG (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG YTD gains are higher at: 39.362 vs. EFSCP (10.062). EFSCP has less debt than FLG: EFSCP (617M) vs FLG (13.2B). FLG has higher revenues than EFSCP: FLG (2.15B) vs EFSCP (552M).
EFSCPFLGEFSCP / FLG
CapitalizationN/A5.39B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.06239.36226%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue552M2.15B26%
Total Cash260MN/A-
Total Debt617M13.2B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCPFLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FELTX90.23N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors M
PABGX204.20N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Advisor
HWLIX45.80N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value I
ROFRX14.28N/A
N/A
Royce Small-Cap Opportunity R
WDSAX15.12N/A
N/A
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap A

EFSCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSCP has been loosely correlated with FRST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFSCP jumps, then FRST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSCP
1D Price
Change %
EFSCP100%
+1.30%
FRST - EFSCP
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
FLG - EFSCP
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
MYFW - EFSCP
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
ESQ - EFSCP
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
OPBK - EFSCP
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
More

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been closely correlated with VLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then VLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
+0.23%
VLY - FLG
67%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
STBA - FLG
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
SBNY - FLG
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BBT - FLG
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
WSFS - FLG
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
More