EFSG
Price
$20.03
Change
+$0.53 (+2.72%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
23.48M
MTPOY
Price
$27.30
Change
+$0.30 (+1.11%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.65B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSG vs MTPOY

Header iconEFSG vs MTPOY Comparison
Open Charts EFSG vs MTPOYBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services Group
Price$20.03
Change+$0.53 (+2.72%)
Volume$2.48K
Capitalization23.48M
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
Price$27.30
Change+$0.30 (+1.11%)
Volume$200
Capitalization5.65B
EFSG vs MTPOY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFSG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSG vs. MTPOY commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSG is a Hold and MTPOY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSG: $20.03 vs. MTPOY: $27.30)
Brand notoriety: EFSG and MTPOY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSG: 180% vs. MTPOY: 100%
Market capitalization -- EFSG: $23.48M vs. MTPOY: $5.65B
EFSG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.48M. MTPOY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMTPOY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MTPOY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTPOY is a better buy in the long-term than EFSG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EFSG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

EFSG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.93% price change this week, while MTPOY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.00% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTPOY($5.65B) has a higher market cap than EFSG($23.5M). EFSG has higher P/E ratio than MTPOY: EFSG (8.24) vs MTPOY (7.13). EFSG YTD gains are higher at: 28.057 vs. MTPOY (2.845). EFSG has less debt than MTPOY: EFSG (58.4M) vs MTPOY (105B). MTPOY has higher revenues than EFSG: MTPOY (151B) vs EFSG (17.2M).
EFSGMTPOYEFSG / MTPOY
Capitalization23.5M5.65B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.0572.845986%
P/E Ratio8.247.13116%
Revenue17.2M151B0%
Total Cash749KN/A-
Total Debt58.4M105B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSG vs MTPOY: Fundamental Ratings
EFSG
MTPOY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2746
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
711
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2634
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFSG's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOY (43). This means that EFSG’s stock grew similarly to MTPOY’s over the last 12 months.

EFSG's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOY (7). This means that EFSG’s stock grew similarly to MTPOY’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EFSG (71). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew significantly faster than EFSG’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSG (48). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to EFSG’s over the last 12 months.

EFSG's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOY (34). This means that EFSG’s stock grew similarly to MTPOY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSGMTPOY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
30%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
43%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWMCX64.990.16
+0.25%
American Funds Washington Mutual R3
ISIVX18.710.04
+0.21%
Voya US Stock Index Port A
ECLCX31.19N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Growth C
JSVRX28.76N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Value R5
FLOWX19.69N/A
N/A
Fidelity Water Sustainability

EFSG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFSG and BDOUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFSG and BDOUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSG
1D Price
Change %
EFSG100%
+2.72%
BDOUF - EFSG
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOY - EFSG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JUVF - EFSG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A

MTPOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTPOY has been loosely correlated with BQCNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTPOY jumps, then BQCNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTPOY
1D Price
Change %
MTPOY100%
N/A
BQCNF - MTPOY
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EDVR - MTPOY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
HCKG - MTPOY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBAJF - MTPOY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFSG - MTPOY
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
More