It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EFSI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFSB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EFSI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFSB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
EFSI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.23% price change this week, while PFSB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.
EFSI is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
EFSI | PFSB | EFSI / PFSB | |
Capitalization | 110M | N/A | - |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 24.963 | 17.460 | 143% |
P/E Ratio | 8.02 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 63M | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 16.6M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 249M | N/A | - |
EFSI | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EFSI | PFSB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago32% | 2 days ago17% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago23% | 2 days ago39% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% | 2 days ago40% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago32% | 2 days ago34% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago27% | 2 days ago27% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago36% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago29% | 3 days ago5% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago20% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago27% | 2 days ago22% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFSI and CHBAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFSI and CHBAF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFSI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EFSI | 100% | +1.26% | ||
CHBAF - EFSI | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PFSB - EFSI | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PBNNF - EFSI | 22% Poorly correlated | +49.70% | ||
CBWBF - EFSI | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ELMA - EFSI | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PFSB and MBIN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFSB and MBIN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFSB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PFSB | 100% | N/A | ||
MBIN - PFSB | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.28% | ||
EFSI - PFSB | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
BAP - PFSB | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
CCB - PFSB | 24% Poorly correlated | -5.50% | ||
BNPQY - PFSB | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.80% | ||
More |