EFV | HDMV | EFV / HDMV | |
Gain YTD | 30.710 | 27.059 | 113% |
Net Assets | 27.8B | 23.2M | 119,828% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.80 | 41% |
Turnover | 28.00 | 79.00 | 35% |
Yield | 3.40 | 3.44 | 99% |
Fund Existence | 20 years | 9 years | - |
EFV | HDMV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago79% | 5 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago69% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFV has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFV jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that HDMV and RTO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HDMV and RTO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HDMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV | 100% | +0.69% | ||
RTO - HDMV | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
TSEM - HDMV | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
LEG - HDMV | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.25% | ||
DNB - HDMV | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
AZN - HDMV | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
More |