EFV | HDMV | EFV / HDMV | |
Gain YTD | 31.956 | 25.029 | 128% |
Net Assets | 26.6B | 22.4M | 118,750% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.80 | 41% |
Turnover | 28.00 | 79.00 | 35% |
Yield | 3.34 | 4.25 | 79% |
Fund Existence | 20 years | 9 years | - |
EFV | HDMV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago78% | 7 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago64% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFV has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFV jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that HDMV and RTO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HDMV and RTO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HDMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV | 100% | +0.25% | ||
RTO - HDMV | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
TSEM - HDMV | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
LEG - HDMV | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
AZN - HDMV | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
FERG - HDMV | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
More |