Ad is loading...
EFXT
Price
$8.34
Change
+$0.35 (+4.38%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
95 days until earnings call
HAL
Price
$29.69
Change
-$0.42 (-1.39%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EFXT vs HAL

Header iconEFXT vs HAL Comparison
Open Charts EFXT vs HALBanner chart's image
Enerflex
Price$8.34
Change+$0.35 (+4.38%)
Volume$445.07K
CapitalizationN/A
Halliburton
Price$29.69
Change-$0.42 (-1.39%)
Volume$8.99M
CapitalizationN/A
EFXT vs HAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFXT vs. HAL commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFXT is a Sell and HAL is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EFXT: $8.34 vs. HAL: $29.69)
Brand notoriety: EFXT: Not notable vs. HAL: Notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFXT: 274% vs. HAL: 89%
Market capitalization -- EFXT: $721.41M vs. HAL: $35.54B
EFXT [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $721.41M. HAL’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $35.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFXT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHAL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EFXT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HAL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAL is a better buy in the long-term than EFXT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFXT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFXT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HAL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EFXT and HAL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EFXT (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +15.03% price change this week, while HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +1.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFXT is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

HAL is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.62% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAL($35.5B) has a higher market cap than EFXT($721M). EFXT YTD gains are higher at: 78.587 vs. HAL (-16.580). HAL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.94B vs. EFXT (358M). HAL has more cash in the bank: 2.26B vs. EFXT (141M). EFXT has less debt than HAL: EFXT (1.32B) vs HAL (8.81B). HAL has higher revenues than EFXT: HAL (23B) vs EFXT (3.16B).
EFXTHALEFXT / HAL
Capitalization721M35.5B2%
EBITDA358M4.94B7%
Gain YTD78.587-16.580-474%
P/E RatioN/A13.67-
Revenue3.16B23B14%
Total Cash141M2.26B6%
Total Debt1.32B8.81B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFXT vs HAL: Fundamental Ratings
EFXT
HAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4813
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9150
SMR RATING
1..100
9034
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10082
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAL's Valuation (36) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as EFXT (38) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFXT (91) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's SMR Rating (34) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFXT (90) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as HAL (60) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as EFXT (100) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFXTHAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIKWX11.94-0.05
-0.42%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Z
RETSX85.50-1.27
-1.46%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed US Large Cap S
PGWTX38.39-0.63
-1.61%
Putnam Focused Equity R6
FCAEX12.22-0.23
-1.85%
Fidelity Climate Action
TIHGX86.35-2.09
-2.36%
The Investment House Growth

EFXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFXT has been loosely correlated with CESDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFXT jumps, then CESDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFXT
1D Price
Change %
EFXT100%
+4.38%
CESDF - EFXT
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
OII - EFXT
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
HAL - EFXT
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
WFRD - EFXT
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
WHD - EFXT
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
More

HAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAL has been closely correlated with LBRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAL jumps, then LBRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAL
1D Price
Change %
HAL100%
-1.39%
LBRT - HAL
77%
Closely correlated
-2.54%
SLB - HAL
76%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
NOV - HAL
76%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
WHD - HAL
75%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
OII - HAL
75%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
More