Ad is loading...
EFXT
Price
$8.34
Change
+$0.35 (+4.38%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
95 days until earnings call
WHD
Price
$64.36
Change
-$1.24 (-1.89%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
107 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EFXT vs WHD

Header iconEFXT vs WHD Comparison
Open Charts EFXT vs WHDBanner chart's image
Enerflex
Price$8.34
Change+$0.35 (+4.38%)
Volume$445.07K
CapitalizationN/A
Cactus
Price$64.36
Change-$1.24 (-1.89%)
Volume$335.2K
CapitalizationN/A
EFXT vs WHD Comparison Chart
Loading...
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WHD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFXT vs. WHD commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFXT is a Sell and WHD is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EFXT: $8.34 vs. WHD: $64.36)
Brand notoriety: EFXT and WHD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFXT: 274% vs. WHD: 51%
Market capitalization -- EFXT: $721.41M vs. WHD: $3.28B
EFXT [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $721.41M. WHD’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $3.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFXT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFXT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHD is a better buy in the long-term than EFXT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFXT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFXT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WHD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EFXT and WHD are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EFXT (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +15.03% price change this week, while WHD (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -4.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFXT is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

WHD is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.62% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHD($3.28B) has a higher market cap than EFXT($721M). EFXT YTD gains are higher at: 78.587 vs. WHD (42.782). EFXT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 358M vs. WHD (332M). EFXT has more cash in the bank: 141M vs. WHD (134M). WHD has less debt than EFXT: WHD (40M) vs EFXT (1.32B). EFXT has higher revenues than WHD: EFXT (3.16B) vs WHD (1.1B).
EFXTWHDEFXT / WHD
Capitalization721M3.28B22%
EBITDA358M332M108%
Gain YTD78.58742.782184%
P/E RatioN/A19.32-
Revenue3.16B1.1B288%
Total Cash141M134M105%
Total Debt1.32B40M3,290%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFXT vs WHD: Fundamental Ratings
EFXT
WHD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4820
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9125
SMR RATING
1..100
9046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10040
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFXT's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as WHD (67) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to WHD’s over the last 12 months.

WHD's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for EFXT (91) in the null industry. This means that WHD’s stock grew significantly faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

WHD's SMR Rating (46) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFXT (90) in the null industry. This means that WHD’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as WHD (43) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to WHD’s over the last 12 months.

WHD's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFXT (100) in the null industry. This means that WHD’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFXTWHD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WHD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISIIX11.07-0.06
-0.54%
Voya International Index Port S2
GPIGX13.23-0.13
-0.94%
Guidepath® Growth and Income
RFNGX86.14-1.26
-1.44%
American Funds Fundamental Invs R6
APSDX17.87-0.38
-2.08%
NYLI Fiera SMID Growth Class R6
QUARX59.73-1.31
-2.15%
AB Small Cap Growth R

EFXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFXT has been loosely correlated with CESDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFXT jumps, then CESDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFXT
1D Price
Change %
EFXT100%
+4.38%
CESDF - EFXT
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
OII - EFXT
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
HAL - EFXT
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
WFRD - EFXT
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
WHD - EFXT
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
More

WHD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHD has been closely correlated with HAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WHD jumps, then HAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHD
1D Price
Change %
WHD100%
-1.89%
HAL - WHD
75%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
WTTR - WHD
72%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
OII - WHD
70%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
PUMP - WHD
69%
Closely correlated
-2.82%
RES - WHD
68%
Closely correlated
-3.05%
More