Ad is loading...
EGLAX vs RMLPX
EGLAX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLAX vs. RMLPX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLAX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 972M vs. EGLAX (210M). RMLPX pays higher dividends than EGLAX: RMLPX (5.08) vs EGLAX (3.81). EGLAX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: EGLAX (13 years) vs RMLPX (7 years). EGLAX (2.06) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). EGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). EGLAX (2500) and RMLPX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. RMLPX (-2.83). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 313.16 vs. RMLPX (255.74).
| EGLAX | RMLPX | EGLAX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.10 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.10 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.987 | -10.675 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 210M | 972M | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 5.08 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | -2.83 | -532% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.70 | 40.42 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 313.16 | 255.74 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.18 | N/A | - |