Ad is loading...
EGLAX vs SMFPX
EGLAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. EGLAX (210M). EGLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLAX (3.81) vs SMFPX (3.38). EGLAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLAX (13 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.13) and EGLAX (2.06) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLAX (41.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLAX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLAX (2500). EGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. SMFPX (11.11). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 313.16 vs. SMFPX (164.96).
| EGLAX | SMFPX | EGLAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.13 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 2.13 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.987 | -8.971 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 210M | 1.14B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 3.38 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 11.11 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.70 | 34.05 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 313.16 | 164.96 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.18 | 7.25 | 458% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...