Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLAX vs SMFPX
EGLAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. EGLAX (214M). EGLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLAX (4.51) vs SMFPX (3.37). EGLAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLAX (13 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than EGLAX (1.92). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLAX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLAX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLAX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.68 vs. EGLAX (4.18). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 268.06 vs. SMFPX (160.73).
| EGLAX | SMFPX | EGLAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 2.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 2.15 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.928 | 0.691 | -424% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214M | 1.22B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.51 | 3.37 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 5.68 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.08 | 58.42 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 268.06 | 160.73 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.46 | 56.91 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement