Ad is loading...
EGLAX vs SMFPX
EGLAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. EGLAX (172M). EGLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLAX (5.23) vs SMFPX (4.75). EGLAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. EGLAX (46.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLAX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLAX (2500). EGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.41 vs. SMFPX (32.13). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 150.05 vs. SMFPX (74.84).
| EGLAX | SMFPX | EGLAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 42.100 | 31.123 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 1.21B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.23 | 4.75 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.41 | 32.13 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 126.81 | 76.61 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 150.05 | 74.84 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.49 | 18.54 | 262% |