Ad is loading...
EGLAX vs SMFPX
EGLAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.33B vs. EGLAX (199M). EGLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLAX (5.23) vs SMFPX (4.75). EGLAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. EGLAX (46.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLAX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLAX (2500). EGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.89 vs. SMFPX (52.07). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 166.04 vs. SMFPX (92.29).
| EGLAX | SMFPX | EGLAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.396 | 9.047 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 199M | 1.33B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.23 | 4.75 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 58.89 | 52.07 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 118.86 | 85.17 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 166.04 | 92.29 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.93 | 40.66 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...