Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLAX vs SMFPX
EGLAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. EGLAX (211M). EGLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLAX (5.05) vs SMFPX (3.55). EGLAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLAX (13 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than EGLAX (1.92). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLAX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLAX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLAX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.71 vs. EGLAX (-0.96). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 245.40 vs. SMFPX (142.73).
| EGLAX | SMFPX | EGLAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 2.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 2.15 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.034 | 3.154 | 33% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 1.23B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.05 | 3.55 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.96 | 0.71 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.73 | 52.05 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 245.40 | 142.73 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.78 | 95.65 | 144% |