Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLAX vs SMRPX
EGLAX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLAX vs. SMRPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLAX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. EGLAX (211M). EGLAX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: EGLAX (5.05) vs SMRPX (4.66). EGLAX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: EGLAX (13 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). EGLAX (1.92) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLAX (32.00). EGLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: EGLAX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. EGLAX (-1.88). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 248.49 vs. SMRPX (157.40).
| EGLAX | SMRPX | EGLAX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.02 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.05 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.135 | 4.198 | 27% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 1.24B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.05 | 4.66 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.88 | 1.05 | -179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.89 | 57.02 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 248.49 | 157.40 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement