Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLCX vs SMFPX
EGLCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. EGLCX (211M). EGLCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLCX (4.22) vs SMFPX (3.55). EGLCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLCX (13 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). EGLCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than SMFPX (2.15). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLCX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLCX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLCX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.15 vs. EGLCX (-2.74). EGLCX return over 5 years is better than : 235.62 vs. SMFPX (143.68).
| EGLCX | SMFPX | EGLCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 2.12 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 2.15 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.443 | 3.154 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 1.24B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.22 | 3.55 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.74 | -0.15 | 1,852% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.20 | 52.05 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 235.62 | 143.68 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.07 | 95.65 | 127% |