Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLIX vs SMFPX
EGLIX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLIX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLIX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. EGLIX (211M). EGLIX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLIX (5.31) vs SMFPX (3.55). EGLIX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLIX (13 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than EGLIX (1.67). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLIX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLIX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLIX (100000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.15 vs. EGLIX (-1.73). EGLIX return over 5 years is better than : 252.78 vs. SMFPX (143.68).
| EGLIX | SMFPX | EGLIX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.12 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.15 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.281 | 3.154 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 1.24B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.31 | 3.55 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.73 | -0.15 | 1,169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.10 | 52.05 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 252.78 | 143.68 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.74 | 95.65 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement