Ad is loading...
EGLNX vs SMFPX
EGLNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLNX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. EGLNX (226M). EGLNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLNX (3.95) vs SMFPX (3.38). EGLNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLNX (7 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.13) is less costly to investors than EGLNX (1.81). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLNX (41.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLNX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLNX (10000000). EGLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.08 vs. SMFPX (22.59). EGLNX return over 5 years is better than : 331.28 vs. SMFPX (170.05).
| EGLNX | SMFPX | EGLNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.13 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 2.13 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.956 | -2.694 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 1000 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 226M | 1.22B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.95 | 3.38 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.08 | 22.59 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.72 | 41.85 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 331.28 | 170.05 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...