Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLNX vs SMFPX
EGLNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. EGLNX (211M). EGLNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLNX (5.24) vs SMFPX (3.55). EGLNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLNX (7 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than EGLNX (1.67). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLNX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLNX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLNX (10000000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.71 vs. EGLNX (-0.52). EGLNX return over 5 years is better than : 253.10 vs. SMFPX (142.73).
| EGLNX | SMFPX | EGLNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 2.12 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.15 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.461 | 3.154 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 1000 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 1.23B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.24 | 3.55 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.52 | 0.71 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.74 | 52.05 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 253.10 | 142.73 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement