It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EGP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUHT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EGP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
EGP (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а -1.31% price change this week, while UHT (@Managed Health Care) price change was +0.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.52%.
EGP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
UHT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
EGP | UHT | EGP / UHT | |
Capitalization | 8.59B | 537M | 1,600% |
EBITDA | 473M | 69.2M | 684% |
Gain YTD | 2.036 | 7.864 | 26% |
P/E Ratio | 34.72 | 30.01 | 116% |
Revenue | 679M | 98.4M | 690% |
Total Cash | 32.9M | 4.32M | 762% |
Total Debt | 1.5B | 379M | 394% |
EGP | UHT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UHT's Valuation (5) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EGP (30). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to EGP’s over the last 12 months.
EGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UHT (100). This means that EGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than UHT’s over the last 12 months.
UHT's SMR Rating (68) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EGP (77). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to EGP’s over the last 12 months.
UHT's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EGP (75). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to EGP’s over the last 12 months.
UHT's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EGP (63). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to EGP’s over the last 12 months.
EGP | UHT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 24 days ago75% | 3 days ago56% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago48% | 3 days ago61% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% | 3 days ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% | 3 days ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago60% | 3 days ago53% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% | 12 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago64% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% | 3 days ago45% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
DTGRX | 70.78 | 0.42 | +0.60% |
BNY Mellon Technology Growth A | |||
ICAFX | 64.28 | 0.28 | +0.44% |
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer F2 | |||
OSVCX | 16.54 | 0.07 | +0.43% |
JPMorgan Small Cap Value C | |||
TGVRX | 30.93 | 0.12 | +0.39% |
Thornburg International Equity R3 | |||
HEOMX | 18.24 | 0.03 | +0.16% |
Hartford Climate Opportunities A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHT has been closely correlated with LXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHT jumps, then LXP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UHT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UHT | 100% | +1.79% | ||
LXP - UHT | 67% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
BFS - UHT | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
PLYM - UHT | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
EGP - UHT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
STAG - UHT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
More |