EGPLF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
12.47M
MLGCF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EGPLF vs MLGCF

Header iconEGPLF vs MLGCF Comparison
Open Charts EGPLF vs MLGCFBanner chart's image
Eagle Plains Resources
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30K
Capitalization12.47M
M3 Metals
Price$0.15
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$17K
Capitalization1.6M
EGPLF vs MLGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EGPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EGPLF vs. MLGCF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGPLF is a Hold and MLGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EGPLF: $0.11 vs. MLGCF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: EGPLF and MLGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EGPLF: 101% vs. MLGCF: 107%
Market capitalization -- EGPLF: $12.47M vs. MLGCF: $1.6M
EGPLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $12.47M. MLGCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EGPLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLGCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EGPLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EGPLF is a better buy in the long-term than MLGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EGPLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLGCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EGPLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MLGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLGCF is a better buy in the short-term than EGPLF.

Price Growth

EGPLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.74% price change this week, while MLGCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EGPLF($12.5M) has a higher market cap than MLGCF($1.6M). MLGCF has higher P/E ratio than EGPLF: MLGCF (15.82) vs EGPLF (2.56). EGPLF YTD gains are higher at: 55.093 vs. MLGCF (7.266). MLGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -548.15K vs. EGPLF (-714.07K). EGPLF has more cash in the bank: 9.42M vs. MLGCF (846K). EGPLF has higher revenues than MLGCF: EGPLF (7.29M) vs MLGCF (0).
EGPLFMLGCFEGPLF / MLGCF
Capitalization12.5M1.6M783%
EBITDA-714.07K-548.15K130%
Gain YTD55.0937.266758%
P/E Ratio2.5615.8216%
Revenue7.29M0-
Total Cash9.42M846K1,114%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EGPLF vs MLGCF: Fundamental Ratings
EGPLF
MLGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6643
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
243
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EGPLF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLGCF (92). This means that EGPLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLGCF’s over the last 12 months.

EGPLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGCF (100). This means that EGPLF’s stock grew similarly to MLGCF’s over the last 12 months.

EGPLF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGCF (97). This means that EGPLF’s stock grew similarly to MLGCF’s over the last 12 months.

EGPLF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGCF (62). This means that EGPLF’s stock grew similarly to MLGCF’s over the last 12 months.

MLGCF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as EGPLF (24). This means that MLGCF’s stock grew similarly to EGPLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EGPLFMLGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EGPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLX22.880.23
+1.02%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
SBEV2.200.01
+0.46%
Splash Beverage Group
STN107.470.44
+0.41%
Stantec
UFI4.63-0.09
-1.91%
UNIFI
SWIN2.49-0.10
-3.86%
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share

EGPLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EGPLF and MLGCF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EGPLF and MLGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EGPLF
1D Price
Change %
EGPLF100%
-0.37%
MLGCF - EGPLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DWMNF - EGPLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRBF - EGPLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EEMMF - EGPLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
DRRSF - EGPLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
More

MLGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLGCF has been loosely correlated with PPZRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLGCF jumps, then PPZRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGCF
1D Price
Change %
MLGCF100%
N/A
PPZRF - MLGCF
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CAXPF - MLGCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ULTHF - MLGCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EGPLF - MLGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
MLXEF - MLGCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
More