It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EHAB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSNUY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EHAB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSNUY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
EHAB (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.40% price change this week, while FSNUY (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1671.32%.
EHAB is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
FSNUY is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
EHAB | FSNUY | EHAB / FSNUY | |
Capitalization | 566M | 17.7B | 3% |
EBITDA | -16.5M | 6.38B | -0% |
Gain YTD | -27.826 | 12.104 | -230% |
P/E Ratio | 10.75 | 12.30 | 87% |
Revenue | 1.05B | 41.3B | 3% |
Total Cash | 27.4M | 2.32B | 1% |
Total Debt | 610M | 27.8B | 2% |
FSNUY | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EHAB | FSNUY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago57% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 17 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago87% | 3 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago53% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago57% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EHAB and USPH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EHAB and USPH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EHAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EHAB | 100% | +0.13% | ||
USPH - EHAB | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.06% | ||
MD - EHAB | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
BKD - EHAB | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.11% | ||
SGRY - EHAB | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.73% | ||
ADUS - EHAB | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSNUY has been loosely correlated with FMS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSNUY jumps, then FMS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSNUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FSNUY | 100% | +1.41% | ||
FMS - FSNUY | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
DVA - FSNUY | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
HCSG - FSNUY | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.14% | ||
SEM - FSNUY | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.57% | ||
EHAB - FSNUY | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
More |