Advertisement
EHAB vs USPH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHAB is a Hold and USPH is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EHAB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSPH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EHAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- USPH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EHAB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USPH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EHAB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- USPH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Reported Earning Dates
EHAB is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
USPH is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
| EHAB | USPH | EHAB / USPH | |
| Capitalization | 386M | 1.33B | 29% |
| EBITDA | -62.8M | 91.6M | -69% |
| Gain YTD | -2.433 | 0.003 | -92,270% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 38.29 | - |
| Revenue | 1.03B | 699M | 148% |
| Total Cash | 39.5M | 39.2M | 101% |
| Total Debt | 544M | 307M | 177% |
USPH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EHAB | USPH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PGTYX | 82.93 | 0.73 | +0.89% |
| Putnam Global Technology Y | |||
| SROAX | 13.48 | 0.09 | +0.67% |
| Calamos Antetokounmpo Sustainable Eqs A | |||
| JHQDX | 19.02 | 0.10 | +0.53% |
| JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 I | |||
| LFGAX | 41.83 | 0.16 | +0.38% |
| Lord Abbett Focused Growth A | |||
| KSOCX | 139.50 | -0.65 | -0.46% |
| Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Adv C | |||
EHAB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EHAB has been loosely correlated with PNTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EHAB jumps, then PNTG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EHAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHAB | 100% | -2.31% | ||
| PNTG - EHAB | 45% Loosely correlated | +7.79% | ||
| AVAH - EHAB | 44% Loosely correlated | +5.68% | ||
| USPH - EHAB | 40% Loosely correlated | +4.69% | ||
| LFST - EHAB | 32% Poorly correlated | +13.21% | ||
| DCGO - EHAB | 32% Poorly correlated | +12.95% | ||
More | ||||
USPH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USPH has been loosely correlated with NHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USPH jumps, then NHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPH | 100% | +4.69% | ||
| NHC - USPH | 47% Loosely correlated | +4.12% | ||
| PNTG - USPH | 43% Loosely correlated | +7.79% | ||
| ENSG - USPH | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| EHAB - USPH | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| SEM - USPH | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||