EHGRF vs GAN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHGRF is a Hold and GAN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EHGRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGAN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EHGRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EHGRF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GAN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EHGRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GAN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EHGRF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -26.33% price change this week, while GAN (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -1.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
GAN is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-2.53% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| EHGRF | GAN | EHGRF / GAN | |
| Capitalization | 1.08B | 59.8M | 1,798% |
| EBITDA | -1.17B | -13.15M | 8,927% |
| Gain YTD | -63.311 | 15.190 | -417% |
| P/E Ratio | 53.76 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.71B | 129M | 1,325% |
| Total Cash | 66.1M | 38.6M | 171% |
| Total Debt | 1.63B | 46.6M | 3,487% |
EHGRF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EHGRF | GAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 15% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 72% |
EHGRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EHGRF and AINSF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EHGRF and AINSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EHGRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHGRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| AINSF - EHGRF | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.39% | ||
| GAN - EHGRF | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| RSI - EHGRF | 3% Poorly correlated | -6.34% | ||
| GIGNF - EHGRF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GLXZ - EHGRF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||
GAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GAN and LFDJF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GAN and LFDJF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAN | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| LFDJF - GAN | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CNTY - GAN | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.40% | ||
| PYTCF - GAN | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BALY - GAN | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| MTN - GAN | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.73% | ||
More | ||||