Ad is loading...
EIBAX vs PDBSX
EIBAX vs PDBSX Comparison
Open Charts EIBAX vs PDBSX
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond I
Price$10.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
PGIM Total Return Bond R4
Price$11.94
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.88B
EIBAX vs PDBSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIBAX vs. PDBSX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIBAX is a Hold and PDBSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBSX has more cash in the bank: 48.9B vs. EIBAX (2.67B). EIBAX pays higher dividends than PDBSX: EIBAX (5.37) vs PDBSX (4.49). EIBAX was incepted earlier than PDBSX: EIBAX (15 years) vs PDBSX (7 years). PDBSX (0.68) is less costly to investors than EIBAX (0.61). EIBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PDBSX (113.00). PDBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIBAX: PDBSX (0) vs EIBAX (1000000). EIBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.26 vs. PDBSX (7.88). EIBAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.28 vs. PDBSX (1.04).
| EIBAX | PDBSX | EIBAX / PDBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.64 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.68 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.580 | 1.956 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 48.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.37 | 4.49 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.26 | 7.88 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.19 | 4.75 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.28 | 1.04 | 1,750% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.22 | N/A | - |