Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIBAX vs PDBSX
EIBAX vs PDBSX Comparison
Open Charts EIBAX vs PDBSX
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond I
Price$10.55
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.12B
PGIM Total Return Bond R4
Price$12.10
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.08B
EIBAX vs PDBSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIBAX vs. PDBSX commentary
Aug 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIBAX is a Hold and PDBSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBSX has more cash in the bank: 50.1B vs. EIBAX (3.12B). EIBAX pays higher dividends than PDBSX: EIBAX (5.13) vs PDBSX (4.08). EIBAX was incepted earlier than PDBSX: EIBAX (16 years) vs PDBSX (8 years). PDBSX (0.68) is less costly to investors than EIBAX (0.61). EIBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PDBSX (113.00). PDBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIBAX: PDBSX (0) vs EIBAX (1000000). EIBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. PDBSX (3.66). EIBAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.30 vs. PDBSX (-1.41).
| EIBAX | PDBSX | EIBAX / PDBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.64 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.68 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.737 | 4.912 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.12B | 50.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.13 | 4.08 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.02 | 3.66 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.97 | 11.32 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.30 | -1.41 | -870% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement