Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIBAX vs PDBZX
EIBAX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts EIBAX vs PDBZX
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond I
Price$10.51
Change+$0.08 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$12.06
Change+$0.10 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.37B
EIBAX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIBAX vs. PDBZX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIBAX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 49.4B vs. EIBAX (3B). EIBAX pays higher dividends than PDBZX: EIBAX (5.20) vs PDBZX (4.64). EIBAX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: EIBAX (16 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). EIBAX (0.61) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). EIBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIBAX: PDBZX (0) vs EIBAX (1000000). EIBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.16 vs. PDBZX (3.64). EIBAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.10 vs. PDBZX (-2.86).
| EIBAX | PDBZX | EIBAX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.50 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.066 | 3.965 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3B | 49.4B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.20 | 4.64 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.16 | 3.64 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.27 | 8.70 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.10 | -2.86 | -388% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.28 | 20.41 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement