Ad is loading...
EIBAX vs PDBZX
EIBAX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts EIBAX vs PDBZX
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond I
Price$10.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.05B
EIBAX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIBAX vs. PDBZX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIBAX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 49B vs. EIBAX (2.67B). EIBAX pays higher dividends than PDBZX: EIBAX (5.37) vs PDBZX (4.64). EIBAX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: EIBAX (15 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). EIBAX (0.61) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). EIBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIBAX: PDBZX (0) vs EIBAX (1000000). EIBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. PDBZX (7.97). EIBAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.47 vs. PDBZX (1.97).
| EIBAX | PDBZX | EIBAX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.50 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.075 | 2.594 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 49B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.37 | 4.64 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.05 | 7.97 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.58 | 6.64 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.47 | 1.97 | 889% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.19 | 18.19 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers