EICA
Price
$24.44
Change
+$0.10 (+0.41%)
Updated
Jul 3, 01:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
KTH
Price
$28.78
Change
+$0.36 (+1.27%)
Updated
Jul 3, 01:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

EICA vs KTH

Header iconEICA vs KTH Comparison
Open Charts EICA vs KTHBanner chart's image
Eagle Point Income
Price$24.44
Change+$0.10 (+0.41%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Structured Products CorTS PECO Energy Cap Trust III
Price$28.78
Change+$0.36 (+1.27%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
EICA vs KTH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EICA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KTH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EICA vs. KTH commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICA is a Hold and KTH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (EICA: $24.44 vs. KTH: $28.78)
Brand notoriety: EICA and KTH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EICA: 75% vs. KTH: 82%
Market capitalization -- EICA: $0 vs. KTH: $0
EICA [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. KTH’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EICA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKTH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EICA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KTH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EICA and KTH are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EICA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KTH’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EICA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KTH’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EICA is a better buy in the short-term than KTH.

Price Growth

EICA (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.25% price change this week, while KTH (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

EICA is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EICA YTD gains are higher at: 5.648 vs. KTH (-1.057).
EICAKTHEICA / KTH
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.648-1.057-534%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue33.1MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KTH: Fundamental Ratings
KTH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
81
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EICAKTH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EICA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KTH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADAP0.250.01
+3.14%
Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc
CVRX6.580.12
+1.86%
CVRx
STC66.910.70
+1.06%
Stewart Information Services Corp
BAYAU11.35N/A
N/A
Bayview Acquisition Corp
MHK110.84-0.45
-0.40%
Mohawk Industries

EICA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EICA has been loosely correlated with EICB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EICA jumps, then EICB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EICA
1D Price
Change %
EICA100%
+0.39%
EICB - EICA
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
OXLCO - EICA
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
CCIA - EICA
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
OXLCN - EICA
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
PFLT - EICA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More

KTH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTH and AMG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTH and AMG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTH
1D Price
Change %
KTH100%
+1.28%
AMG - KTH
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
TURN - KTH
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
EICA - KTH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
HNNA - KTH
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
TRIN - KTH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More