EICA
Price
$24.58
Change
+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Updated
Aug 15, 12:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
OXLCN
Price
$24.09
Change
-$0.21 (-0.86%)
Updated
Aug 15, 01:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

EICA vs OXLCN

Header iconEICA vs OXLCN Comparison
Open Charts EICA vs OXLCNBanner chart's image
Eagle Point Income
Price$24.58
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Oxford Lane Capital
Price$24.09
Change-$0.21 (-0.86%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
EICA vs OXLCN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EICA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXLCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EICA vs. OXLCN commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICA is a Hold and OXLCN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (EICA: $24.57 vs. OXLCN: $24.30)
Brand notoriety: EICA and OXLCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EICA: 58% vs. OXLCN: 16%
Market capitalization -- EICA: $0 vs. OXLCN: $0
EICA [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. OXLCN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EICA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOXLCN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EICA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OXLCN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OXLCN is a better buy in the long-term than EICA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EICA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OXLCN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EICA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OXLCN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EICA is a better buy in the short-term than OXLCN.

Price Growth

EICA (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.62% price change this week, while OXLCN (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.80% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EICA YTD gains are higher at: 7.107 vs. OXLCN (4.538). OXLCN has more cash in the bank: 27.2M vs. EICA (31.1K). EICA has less debt than OXLCN: EICA (9.03M) vs OXLCN (487M). OXLCN has higher revenues than EICA: OXLCN (57.3M) vs EICA (45.7M).
EICAOXLCNEICA / OXLCN
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.1074.538157%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue45.7M57.3M80%
Total Cash31.1K27.2M0%
Total Debt9.03M487M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OXLCN: Fundamental Ratings
OXLCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EICAOXLCN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
12%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
4%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
5%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
19%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EICA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXLCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LANDM24.85-0.01
-0.06%
Gladstone Land Corp
KOSS5.47-0.01
-0.18%
Koss Corp
QUAD6.45-0.05
-0.77%
QUAD/GRAPHICS
TNC82.68-2.66
-3.12%
Tennant Company
LITE114.62-5.61
-4.67%
Lumentum Holdings

EICA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EICA has been loosely correlated with EICB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EICA jumps, then EICB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EICA
1D Price
Change %
EICA100%
+0.07%
EICB - EICA
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
OXLCO - EICA
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
CCIA - EICA
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
OXLCN - EICA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
PFLT - EICA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More

OXLCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OXLCN has been loosely correlated with OCCIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OXLCN jumps, then OCCIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OXLCN
1D Price
Change %
OXLCN100%
-0.21%
OCCIN - OXLCN
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
OXLCP - OXLCN
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EICB - OXLCN
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
OXLCO - OXLCN
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
CCIA - OXLCN
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
More