EICA
Price
$24.60
Change
+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jul 25, 03:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
OXLCN
Price
$24.27
Change
-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jul 25, 03:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

EICA vs OXLCN

Header iconEICA vs OXLCN Comparison
Open Charts EICA vs OXLCNBanner chart's image
Eagle Point Income
Price$24.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
Oxford Lane Capital
Price$24.27
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$325
CapitalizationN/A
EICA vs OXLCN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EICA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXLCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EICA vs. OXLCN commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICA is a Hold and OXLCN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EICA: $24.62 vs. OXLCN: $24.06)
Brand notoriety: EICA and OXLCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EICA: 87% vs. OXLCN: 49%
Market capitalization -- EICA: $0 vs. OXLCN: $0
EICA [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. OXLCN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EICA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOXLCN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EICA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OXLCN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EICA and OXLCN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EICA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OXLCN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EICA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OXLCN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EICA is a better buy in the short-term than OXLCN.

Price Growth

EICA (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.41% price change this week, while OXLCN (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

EICA is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

OXLCN is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.65% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EICA YTD gains are higher at: 6.878 vs. OXLCN (3.521). OXLCN has higher revenues than EICA: OXLCN (142M) vs EICA (33.1M).
EICAOXLCNEICA / OXLCN
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.8783.521195%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue33.1M142M23%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A195M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OXLCN: Fundamental Ratings
OXLCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EICAOXLCN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
5%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EICA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXLCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REE0.760.02
+2.74%
REE Automotive Ltd
COMP7.220.09
+1.26%
Compass
CAI29.540.05
+0.17%
Caris Life Sciences Inc
VALU39.670.01
+0.03%
Value Line
FTAIM26.74-0.01
-0.05%
FTAI Aviation Ltd

EICA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EICA has been loosely correlated with EICB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EICA jumps, then EICB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EICA
1D Price
Change %
EICA100%
+0.14%
EICB - EICA
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OXLCO - EICA
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCIA - EICA
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
OXLCN - EICA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
PFLT - EICA
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OXLCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OXLCN has been loosely correlated with OCCIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OXLCN jumps, then OCCIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OXLCN
1D Price
Change %
OXLCN100%
-0.97%
OCCIN - OXLCN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
OXLCP - OXLCN
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
EICB - OXLCN
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OXLCO - OXLCN
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCIA - OXLCN
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More