EICC
Price
$25.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25, 04:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
SII
Price
$78.30
Change
+$1.11 (+1.44%)
Updated
Sep 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.04B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EICC vs SII

Header iconEICC vs SII Comparison
Open Charts EICC vs SIIBanner chart's image
Eagle Point Income
Price$25.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Sprott
Price$78.30
Change+$1.11 (+1.44%)
Volume$2.65K
Capitalization2.04B
EICC vs SII Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EICC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EICC vs. SII commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICC is a Buy and SII is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EICC: $25.03 vs. SII: $78.24)
Brand notoriety: EICC and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EICC: 63% vs. SII: 117%
Market capitalization -- EICC: $0 vs. SII: $2.04B
EICC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EICC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EICC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SII is a better buy in the long-term than EICC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EICC’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SII’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EICC’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SII’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SII is a better buy in the short-term than EICC.

Price Growth

EICC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was +8.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

SII is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.99% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SII YTD gains are higher at: 88.647 vs. EICC (6.211). SII has more cash in the bank: 75.4M vs. EICC (31.1K). EICC has less debt than SII: EICC (8.49M) vs SII (18.7M). SII has higher revenues than EICC: SII (186M) vs EICC (21.9M).
EICCSIIEICC / SII
CapitalizationN/A2.04B-
EBITDAN/A73.9M-
Gain YTD6.21188.6477%
P/E RatioN/A40.33-
Revenue21.9M186M12%
Total Cash31.1K75.4M0%
Total Debt8.49M18.7M45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SII: Fundamental Ratings
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EICCSII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
4%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EICC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELAN18.920.17
+0.91%
Elanco Animal Health
ROCK61.050.05
+0.08%
Gibraltar Industries
DYCQU11.10N/A
N/A
DT Cloud Acquisition Corp
VATE4.75-0.06
-1.25%
INNOVATE Corp
KMDA6.69-0.20
-2.90%
Kamada Ltd

EICC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EICC and ECCF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EICC and ECCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EICC
1D Price
Change %
EICC100%
+0.04%
ECCF - EICC
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
EICB - EICC
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
SII - EICC
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
MGLD - EICC
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
OCCIO - EICC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SII has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SII jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SII
1D Price
Change %
SII100%
+1.36%
BN - SII
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
BK - SII
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
PAX - SII
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
ARES - SII
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.92%
ARCC - SII
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
More