Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKCX
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$18.91
Change-$0.12 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.37
Change-$0.21 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. EICGX (43.7M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: EICGX (1.80) vs FHKCX (0.96). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKCX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.70 vs. EICGX (33.98). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.38 vs. EICGX (-34.85).
| EICGX | FHKCX | EICGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.91 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.075 | 37.773 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.96 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.98 | 36.70 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.29 | 78.42 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.85 | 0.38 | -9,208% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.77 | 87.39 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement