Ad is loading...
EICGX vs FHKCX
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance Greater China Growth I
Price$14.71
Change-$0.38 (-2.52%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity China Region
Price$41.29
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
EICGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Oct 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a StrongSell and FHKCX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. EICGX (37.9M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than EICGX: FHKCX (1.84) vs EICGX (0.55). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: EICGX (15 years) vs FHKCX (29 years). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FHKCX (24.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKCX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.45 vs. EICGX (-0.80). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.55 vs. EICGX (-36.85).
| EICGX | FHKCX | EICGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.388 | 29.053 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.9M | 1.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.84 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.80 | 31.45 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | -42.70 | -16.84 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.85 | 20.55 | -179% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.23 | 29.19 | -86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers