Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKIX
EICGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$17.65
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.09M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$46.78
Change-$0.15 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
EICGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Buy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. EICGX (41.1M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: EICGX (1.97) vs FHKIX (1.21). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKIX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.19 vs. FHKIX (32.59). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 1.69 vs. EICGX (-31.20).
| EICGX | FHKIX | EICGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.90 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.90 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.643 | 21.255 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 1.31B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.21 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.19 | 32.59 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.18 | 47.24 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.20 | 1.69 | -1,849% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.17 | 55.91 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement